|
| Friday, July 18, 2008 |
| Anyone battling rising gas costs by car pooling? |
The Boston Globe Magazine article: Anybody Want a Ride? looks at why Carpooling is not catching on when other energy saving habits and changes are. Good for the environment, the pocketbook, and perhaps even the social life, car pooling would seem, at this particular moment in history, to have a lot going for it. Environmentalists and traffic planners say it's one of the easiest and cheapest ways for cities to decrease pollution and congestion - never mind helping individuals reduce transportation expenses, which as of 2006 consumed approximately 15 percent of the average American budget (12 percent for those in the Northeast), according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. And unlike public transit, a car pool requires little in the way of costly taxpayer-funded infrastructure or maintenance.
But Americans don't carpool much. In fact, over the past quarter century, despite increased traffic, fuel costs, and growing awareness of environmental issues, we've been doing it less and less. According to the federal Department of Transportation, the number of solo drivers on US roads nearly tripled between 1960 and 2000. In 1980, when the US Census began tracking car pooling, almost 20 percent of American workers shared rides to work. By 1990, the number had fallen to 13 percent. In 2006 - the newest data available - it was down to about 11 percent. Now, however, with 2008 poised to go down in history as the Year of the $4 Gallon of Gas, drivers are showing an interest in alternatives. MBTA ridership jumped 6.4 percent between January and June. A spokeswoman for the state's Mass-RIDES program, which maintains a ride-matching database, says her office is getting more calls than usual from commuters feeling the pinch. With so much attention focused on the cost of driving, policy makers have an unprecedented window of opportunity to encourage car pooling. "It's something people can do immediately that would have a fairly dramatic impact on what they're spending on gasoline," says David Luberoff, executive director of Harvard's Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston. Interesting article - we shall see if gas prices eventually do resurrect car pooling as a commuting option. |
posted by Boston Gal @ 11:24 AM *
 *
View post reactions *
* Subscribe to Boston Gal's Open Wallet |
|
|
|
| Thursday, July 17, 2008 |
| You know the economy is bad when the WSJ rediscovers libraries |
The WSJ article: If It's Not by Tolstoy, Hold On to Your Rubles points out the economic benefits of a library card. When exactly did Barnes & Noble replace the public library?
I was shocked a couple of years ago when I learned a fellow worker with small children didn't know where the neighborhood branch of the local public library was. Turns out any time his kids wanted a book, he went out and bought it for them. Same for his own reading.
Talk about extravagance. I have been guilty of under-utilizing my local library branch, but I made an effort to get reacquainted with it during my recent staycation. Even so, I never feel guilty for buying a book. I budget for my book addiction and I am also pretty good at reselling the books when they start to overwhelm my small home.
I just find it funny that the WSJ is mentioning them - if I start noticing BMWs parked outside my local branch and the book racks crowded with people in business attire, I will know who to blame! |
posted by Boston Gal @ 2:27 PM *
 *
View post reactions *
* Subscribe to Boston Gal's Open Wallet |
|
|
|
| Wednesday, July 16, 2008 |
| Best-case scenario is mild recession |
The USAToday article: Economic pain: 'Payback' for debt-fueled growth? indicates that our current economic woes are likely to get worse and be with us for a long time to come. If it wasn't clear before Tuesday, it is now: This is no ordinary economic crisis, and it won't be over anytime soon. In fact, problems are multiplying. A year ago, the financial virus seemed confined to subprime mortgages, defaults on loans given to those with less-than-perfect credit. Now, much of the banking system appears rickety, and the U.S. economy has slowed to a crawl. But thanks to robust demand from still-growing countries such as China, the prices of commodities from oil to food have soared — hitting Americans from the gas pump to the grocery checkout.
"There's no hope of an early recovery at this point," says economist Kenneth Rogoff of Harvard University. "The best-case scenario is we have a long but mild recession — and that's the best-case scenario." While I am generally a glass-is-half-full kind of Gal, in this instance I am thinking we are headed for worse-case here. Hopefully I will be proven wrong. |
posted by Boston Gal @ 10:07 AM *
 *
View post reactions *
* Subscribe to Boston Gal's Open Wallet |
|
|
|
| Tuesday, July 15, 2008 |
| Where Americans will (and won't) cut back |
The CNNMoney.com article: Where Americans will (and won't) cut back points out who is feeling the current economic pain the most: Generation X, defined here as Americans between 28 and 43 years old, are also getting especially pinched. They are particularly vulnerable because they are more likely to have young children, recently purchased a home or are in the market for one, and fall mostly within the middle class. According to the article, these folks are cutting back on spending - but not on everything. But that doesn't mean there's no fun to be had. Many Americans are leaving the car in the garage and staying on their living room couch. A whopping 50% of Americans plan to buy an HD or flat-panel TV in the next year, the study showed, with little difference between those who are hardest hit by the downturn and those who are not. Cable and satellite TV subscriptions are also way down the list on cutbacks. Hum, while I am a member of Generation X and working on ways to cutback on my spending, buying a new TV is not an investment I am planning on making. The article also mentions more people cultivating gardens as a way of saving on food costs. That seems like a positive change to me.
Don't get me wrong, I think TV is a great economical entertainment option. But I would hope board game purchases would also increase as well as book sales (and library use) now that people are looking for inexpensive ways to entertain themselves. |
posted by Boston Gal @ 8:37 PM *
 *
View post reactions *
* Subscribe to Boston Gal's Open Wallet |
|
|
|
|
| Just ask for the rope aisle at Home Depot |
I am moving ahead with my clothes line project at Boston Gal's HQ. I visited a local Home Depot this weekend to pick up the needed supplies, but was having trouble locating the correct aisle. Silly me asked a couple of orange vested employees where the clothes lines could be found and got lots of blank stares and shrugged shoulders. One young employee insisted that the store did not sell clothes lines.
Finally I was able to find the aisle by changing what I was asking for: "Do you have rope, pulleys, eyelets, and hooks?" To that question the reply from the Home Depot employee was an immediate "Oh yes, all of those items are here, in fact there is a display area with all of those items grouped together in aisle 16."
When I visited aisle 16 sure enough I found everything I needed, along with clothes pins and various retractable clothes lines... |
posted by Boston Gal @ 1:52 PM *
 *
View post reactions *
* Subscribe to Boston Gal's Open Wallet |
|
|
|
| Monday, July 14, 2008 |
| Babysitting the teenagers |
One of my duties as an Aunt has always been babysitting. My first Nephew (followed just days later by my first Niece) both appeared while I was still in college. I gladly spent my first Spring break as an Aunt getting to know my Nephew while his Mother spent quality time sleeping. Once I graduated from College and moved back to Boston the Nieces and Nephews kept multiplying and the need of my services for a night here or a weekend there grew. It was great for me, since I was a poor young professional and those babysitting gigs gave me pocket money, a place to do laundry, a meal, and lots of quality time with my favorite young people.
But the need for babysitting has waned as the older ones started taking care of the younger and as some of my siblings moved away with their families. I still see my Nieces and Nephews all the time, but I was not getting paid to do it anymore.
Then a strange thing happened. They started becoming teenagers and now, instead of my going to their home to visit, they are coming to my house. Invariably they are looking for ways to earn some pocket money. So now I am the one paying for them to spend time with me.
Currently I have two of my Nephews staying at my home (16 yrs old and 13 yrs old) and they will be with me for a couple of nights. They are camped out in my living room slowly working their way through a list of chores I created for them. Not only am I "babysitting" them, but I will be paying them for the chores. Plus, since I can't have them thinking a visit to Auntie's house is all work and no play, we are eating out, renting or going to movies, and generally having a great time.
I never realized how expensive babysitting could be... |
posted by Boston Gal @ 11:48 AM *
 *
View post reactions *
* Subscribe to Boston Gal's Open Wallet |
|
|
|
| Sunday, July 13, 2008 |
| Running a Home on Yankee Ingenuity |
The New York Times article: Running a Home on Yankee Ingenuity profiles the Halpine-Harrington family of Bethany, Connecticut.
The article goes on to document the families many green home improvements - such as the $45,000 in solar panels (after rebates it really cost them $24,000), the large vegetable garden, the super insulated attic, etc. But reading the article you get the sense the reporter is just not that excited about having to document this home. Nor does she seem all that taken with the family as a whole. Which is another way of saying that Mr. Halpine and his family are energy efficient to a fault, dedicated to getting the greatest return for their time and calories.
“My father, when he retired, put four inches of insulation in his basement and a wood stove, and solar hot water,” Mr. Halpine said admiringly.
Not that his dad called himself green. “He’s a cheap Yankee and he couldn’t fathom paying good money for heat.” I just found the whole article rather amusing. The poor reporter had to schlep to the suburbs and document a normal family who are more worried about spending money on things that make their home energy efficient and affordable and no mention is made of granite countertops or custom made drapery or antique furniture finds... Poor NYTimes reporter, real estate is going to be more and more about affordability and efficiency and less about overpriced materials and designers. |
posted by Boston Gal @ 1:15 PM *
 *
View post reactions *
* Subscribe to Boston Gal's Open Wallet |
|
|
|
| Saturday, July 12, 2008 |
| IndyMac fails and FDIC takes over |
The Associated Press story: Government shuts down mortgage lender IndyMac reports on the largest bank failure since 1984. The FDIC takeover of IndyMac is good news if you are a depositor with less than $100,000 - bad news if you have more than that in the bank. The FDIC planned to reopen the bank on Monday as IndyMac Federal Bank, FSB.
Deposits are insured up to $100,000 per depositor.
As of March 31, IndyMac had total deposits of $19.06 billion.
Some 10,000 depositors had funds in excess of the insured limit, for a total of $1 billion in potentially uninsured funds, the FDIC said.
Customers with uninsured deposits could begin making appointments to file a claim with the FDIC on Monday. The agency said it would pay unsecured depositors an advance dividend equal to half of the uninsured amount.
During a conference call with reporters, FDIC Chairman Sheila C. Bair said the agency would cover all insured deposits and then try to recover its costs by selling IndyMac's assets.
"We anticipate trying to market the institution as a whole bank," Bair said. "How much money we derive from that will depend on who gets paid what."
Holders of unsecured IndyMac debt may not fully recover their investment, Bair said.
"Generally if a creditor is secured, they are at the top of the claims priority," she said. "If they are unsecured, they're pretty low on the claims priority and probably will take some type of haircut with this, but we have not had a chance to do a thorough analysis to know ... how extensive those losses will be."
IndyMac spent the last two weeks trying to reassure customers that it was not near default. FDIC IndyMac Page |
posted by Boston Gal @ 11:30 AM *
 *
View post reactions *
* Subscribe to Boston Gal's Open Wallet |
|
|
|
|
| M.P. Dunleavey finally admits to buyers remorse for the 2nd house |
The New York Times article: Sleepless and Worried in My House has M.P. Dunleavey finally admitting to buyers remorse over the purchase of her second home. It’s the rest of the package that keeps me up at night. Seven months ago the market was too soft to think about selling our old home; hence the idea of renting it out. Although we found reliable tenants — knock on wood — I’m not sure we really examined the true cost of maintaining a rental.
It’s a headache. And a bank-ache. We are going to put at least $4,000 into the rental house this summer alone. We can deduct that as an expense, and it will partially offset the $9,000 we’re getting in rental income. My accountant thinks we’ll break even, but I still fret. I hate knowing that we are on the hook if anything goes wrong. Can our emergency fund cover all the calamities that might strike two properties: foundation trouble and roof leaks and clogged plumbing, oh my?
WE assumed that we could sell the rental house in a year or two when the market perked up, thus preserving our equity. But there’s no perking in sight. Now we think sanity is more important than profit. “Even if it’s a wash, let’s unload it next spring,” my husband said. At this rate, let’s hope it’s not a loss.
As happy as we are in our current home, sometimes I question the tens of thousands of dollars that went into buying it. What if we had put that money into our old home instead, and renovated it rather than moved? Would that have been a smarter investment? If we had stayed where we were, our mortgage and heating bills would have been about half — half! — of what it will cost us to live in this big barn of a place. Sigh, she answered her own question. Of course her family would be better off financially if she was paying far less for her mortgage and heating costs. We are all in for a very bumpy ride in this economy over the next twelve to twenty four months. M.P. works in an industry that is announcing layoffs on a regular and increasing basis. She lives in a rural area with few local job prospects. Her husband seems to works in a couple of part-time jobs. She has already experienced what unexpected medical bills can do to a self-employed insured persons emergency fund. Add to that her now stretched far-to-tight budget for the more expensive home and mix in rising food, gasoline, and utility costs - no wonder buyers remorse has finally hit.
However, her plan of trying to sell the 1st home in the Spring does not seem like the smart solution to me. Instead, she should take this time now, while the home is occupied by the tenants, to continue the necessary repair projects and make any improvements she feels are necessary. Then, in the Spring, she should move her family back into the affordable smaller home and put the expensive 2nd home on the market. If it is as attractive and seductive as she has made it seem, finding a buyer for it should not be a problem. Once back in the smaller home, MP and her husband can be a bit more creative in finding solutions to their space problems. Two options I would explore would be putting a "writers shed" in the yard of the cottage. Obviously it would be insulated, heated, and fully wired. The other possibility would be to look into adding a sun room onto the cottage to expand the living space and use that as an office. Either solution should be within MP's means and help add value to the cottage.
Most importantly, MP and her family would be back in an affordable home. A home which will allow them to save more for retirement, put something away for her young son's college education, and enable her to maintain a plump emergency fund. What could be more seductive than that?!Labels: MP |
posted by Boston Gal @ 12:47 AM *
 *
View post reactions *
* Subscribe to Boston Gal's Open Wallet |
|
|
|
|
|